THE DUMBEST GENERATION?| Argumentative Synthesis EssayZACHARY VOSSTHE DUMBEST GENERATION?Mark Bauerlein, an English professor at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, claims that Generation Y, the current age group of people under 30, is the “dumbest generation” becauseof their lack of knowledge and skill and their inability to keep pace with their intellectual habits, despite the fact that accessible resources for learning are plentiful and the material gains are clear[Bau08]. However, Bauerlein seems to ignore the fact that there have been hundreds of generations before Generation Y, and humans have been on Earth for tens of thousands of years. Generation Y is not the dumbest generation in the history of mankind, but the most technologically facilitated, which leads to their arrogance.A problem surrounding this conversation is what Bauerlein means by “dumbest;” does hemean the least knowledge or the most idiocrasy? IQ scores have been on the rise constantly
Dumbest Generation Analysis Essay
3052 WordsSep 26th, 201213 Pages
AP Language Summer Assignment
1. In chapter one of The Dumbest Generation, Mike Bauerlein makes several statements about our generation and comes to a conclusion that helps set the groundwork for the entire book. His analysis of today’s youth states that the current generation is lacking when it comes to intellectual knowledge. He provides evidence that states that today’s under-thirty population in the United States does not have adequate knowledge, and their lack of knowledge with affect them greatly in their adulthood years.
2. As with most of this book, the main supports that Bauerlein uses for his conclusion come in the form of statistics. As chapter 1 progresses, he cites more and more surveys, polls, and studies…show more content…
Many of the statistics shocked me and made me wonder about the future for our generation. As I continued reading, I realized how much of the surveys and statistics that he used were deceptive and manipulated my way of thinking. Bauerlein uses and abuses statistics to sway his readers thoughts to what he believes is correct. Statistics are not as reliable as they may seem but the author did use valid and trustworthy resources and organizations such as The National Board of Science. The argument was very convincing and did make me wonder about the future for our generation and made me even more worried about the next generation after mine. Overall, the argument was strong and well planned.
1. In chapter two of The Dumbest Generation, Mark Bauerlein expands upon his stated conclusion from the first chapter. He proclaims that one of the main reasons for the “knowledge deficits” of the under-thirty generation is a nationwide “bibliophobia”, which is a fear of books or rather the lack of willingness to read.
2. The main evidence that Bauerlein gives us to support his theory is statistics that are found in a survey that show the falling reading rates for people of all ages in the last 30 years. The most popular survey was held by the National Endowment of the Arts Association entitled Survey of Public Participation in the Arts.
A. Survey of Public Participation in the Arts, which the National Endowment for the Arts