In last weeks blog, I discussed the importance of questions that begin with ‘why’ that students must be asked to strengthen their understanding of the rationale for everything that is done in practice.
In today’s blog, there is another series of questions that must be asked to every student in the clinical setting to strengthen their critical thinking skills which will then improve their ability to clinically reason and make a correct clinical judgment.
This line of questions also begins with a ‘w” and is the word ‘what’
Asking questions of students is one of my favorite strategies to quickly and easily assess and evaluate their level of knowledge and understanding in the clinical setting.
When I was a new clinical adjunct and ICU nurse, I took it for granted that since students were currently in school, they would have a deep knowledge of pharmacology like I had once in practice.
As a critical care nurse, understanding the mechanism of action of the most common and important medications and IV drips used in this context is essential to the critical thinking and anticipation of the expected physiologic effects as well as most common side effects.
So as my first student that day confidently responded that the atenolol she was going to administer is a beta blocker and it was a safe dose to give, I innocently asked a simple question that I thought would be simple:
“What is a beta blocker blocking?”
She looked at me with a blank look and fear was clearly evident because she did not know the answer. I was confident that she knew the answer but I had to draw it out. So I asked, “is this medication blocking sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous system stimulation?”
I responded, “if it is blocking sympathetic stimulation, knowing how fight or flight will impact heart rate and blood pressure, how will this medication affect your patient if it blocking this effect?”
She confidently responded, “It will lower heart rate and blood pressure.”
By using additional questions of a lower level of difficulty (content), the correct answer was drawn out, and her confidence in her ability remained intact though it took additional time.
What I learned from this exchange that has since been repeated numerous times as an educator is do NOT assume that just because a student can confidently state the pharmacologic classification of the drug, that this equals knowledge and understanding of the mechanism of action.
To test this hypothesis yourself, ask your students that following “what” questions in your next clinical …
- WHAT is a beta blocker blocking?
- WHAT is a calcium channel blocker blocking?
- WHAT is an ACE inhibitor inhibiting?
This level of understanding is essential because once the student can communicate this content in their OWN WORDS, and not simple parrot what is written in the drug handbook, they will be able to readily identify the clinical relationship between the physiologic effect and the most common side effects and nursing assessments that are required by the nurse WITHOUT looking them up in the drug handbook!
For example, once the mechanism of a beta blocker is clearly understood, it becomes obvious that the assessments that are needed by the nurse in order to be safe to administer are BP and HR and that the most common side effects are low HR and hypotension!
Additional ‘What’ Questions
Since medication administration is an essential responsibility of the professional nurse, the following are a series I ask my students of the most common medications that must be deeply understood:
- WHAT is the pharmacologic class?
- WHAT is the mechanism of action (in your own words)?
- WHAT is the expected patient response based on the mechanism of action?
- WHAT assessments do you need to know before you administer and then follow up afterward
- WHY is your patient receiving? (not a ‘what’ but to deepen nurse thinking its all about the ‘whats’ and the ‘whys’!)
When a student can verbalize this series of ‘what’ questions, they have clearly communicated that they have the foundational knowledge needed and are safe to administer.
This series of questions guides students to identify the most likely/worst possible complication. This is the first step to prepare students to ‘rescue’ if there is a change in status. In the clinical setting, faculty can use the most common complications to help develop this proactive nurse thinking skill. Expect students to not only identify the nursing assessments but also the interventions if any of these complications develop.
The following are examples of this line of questioning:
‘What if’ your patient…
- Develops chest pain?
- Develops a temp of 101?
- Drops BP to 90/50?
- Develops acute confusion on patient controlled analgesia?
- Develops rapid irregular heart rate of 140?
- Develops sudden onset of shortness of breath
‘What” and Priority Setting
Two questions on my template of 12 clinical reasoning questions (FREE download) that break down the essence of clinical reasoning to practice also begin with ‘what’ and emphasize the importance of identifying correct priorities.
- WHAT nursing priority captures the “essence” of your patient’s current status and will guide your plan of care?
- WHAT educational priorities have you identified and how will you address them?
Remember that the primary objective of the clinical educator is NOT about the tasks and how many procedures and medications you can administer (I too have made this my barometer of a successful clinical in the past!). But it is all about developing the THINKING of each student and providing opportunities to APPLY knowledge in the clinical setting and strengthen their ability to think like a nurse!
By using these and other questions that accomplish this same objective, though you will be remembered as difficult and tough, you will have your students thank you after they graduate because they will appreciate that you were the one who prepared them well for real world clinical practice!
What questions do you consistently utilize in the clinical setting to strengthen the thinking of your students?
Comment below and let the conversation begin!
Personal Note from Keith
The work that I do with KeithRN is not my primary business, but an extension of my passion to see nursing education transformed. I cannot do this alone. Anything you do (or click!) will make you a needed partner to bring about this needed radical transformation!
If you have found today’s blog post helpful, I have one favor to ask…pay it forward by forwarding this blog post in some manner to other students or colleagues who would benefit.
If you received this blog by email, use the bottom link to forward. Better yet, use the social media links below to post to facebook, Twitter, Linked In, or Google +
1. McComas W, Abraham L. Asking more effective questions. Rossier School of Education. http://cet.usc.edu/resources/teaching_learning/material_docs/Asking_Better_Questions.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2012.
2. Christenbury L, Kelly PP. Questioning: A Path to Critical Thinking. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English; 1983.
3. Ciardiello AV. Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. J Adolesc Adult Lit.1998;42(3):210–219.
4. Brualdi AC. Classroom questions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation.1998;6(6)http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=6. Accessed October 16, 2012.
5. Chin C. Teacher questioning in science classrooms: what approaches stimulate productive thinking? J Res Sci Teach.2007;44(6):815–843.
6. Gose M. When Socratic dialogue is flagging: questions and strategies for engaging students. J Coll Teach Learn.2009;57(1):45–49.
7. Lorsch N, Ronkowski S. Teaching Tips for TA’s. Effective Questioning Enhances Student Learning, Instructional Development. Santa Barbara, CA: Office of Instructional Consultation, University of California, Santa Barbara; 1982.
8. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc; 1956.
9. Neal MA. Engaging students through effective questions. Educ Can.2012;52(4)www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/engaging-students-through-effective-questions. Accessed October 16, 2012.
10. Wilen WW. Questioning Skills for Teachers, 3rd ed. Washington DC: NEA Professional Library, National Education Association; 1991: 5-32.
11. Saeed T, Khan S, Ahmed A, Gul R, Cassum S, Parpio Y. Development of students’ critical thinking: the educators’ ability to use questioning skills in the baccalaureate programmes in nursing in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc.2012;63(3):200–203.[PubMed]
12. Ertmer PA, Sadaf A, Ertmer DJ. Student-content interactions in online courses: the role of question prompts in facilitating higher level engagement with course content. J Comput High Educ.2011;23(2-3):157–186.
13. Sellappah S, Hussey T, Blackmore AM, McMurray A. The use of questioning strategies by clinical teachers. J Adv Nurs.1998;28(1):142–148.[PubMed]
14. Phillips N, Duke M. The questioning skills of clinical teachers and preceptors: a comparative study. J Adv Nurs.2001;33(4):523–529.[PubMed]
15. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Airasian PW, et al. Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, 2nd ed, abridged. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
16. Yang YC, Newby TJ, Bill RL. Using Socratic questioning to promote critical thinking skills through asynchronous discussion forums in distance learning environments. Am J Distance Educ.2005;19(3):163–181.
17. Paul R, Elder L. Critical thinking: the art of Socratic questioning, part III. J Dev Educ.2008;31(3):34–35.
18. Boghossian P. Socratic pedagogy: perplexity, humiliation, shame and a broken egg. Educ Philos Theory.2012;44(7):710–720.
19. Bowker MH. Teaching students to ask questions instead of answering them. Thought & Action.2010;26(Fall):127–134.
20. Wilson NS, Smetana L. Questioning as thinking: a metacognitive framework to improve comprehension of expository text. Literacy.2011;45(2):84–90.
21. Rowe MB. Wait time: slowing down may be a way of speeding up! J Teach Educ.1986;37(1):43–50.
22. Nicholl HM, Tracey CA. Questioning: a tool in the nurse educator’s kit. Nurse Educ Pract.2007;7(5):285–292.[PubMed]
23. Rowe MB. Relation of wait time and rewards to the development of language, logic and fate control: part one- wait time. J Res Sci Teach.1974;11(4):291–308.
24. Rowe MB. Pausing principles and their effects on reasoning in science. New Dir Community Coll.1980;31:27–34.
25. Brancati FL. The art of pimping. JAMA.1989;262(1):89–90.[PubMed]
26. Detsky A. The art of pimping. JAMA.2009;301(13):1379–1381.[PubMed]
27. Zygmont DM, Schaeffer KM. Assessing the critical thinking skills of faculty: what do the findings mean for nursing education? Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006;27(5):260–268.[PubMed]