Phi 105 Comparison Essay

Ethical Theory Comparison Chart PHI/105 Version 5 1 Associate Level Material Ethical Theory Comparison Chart Respond to the prompt for each of the five ethical theories listed. One section on each chart has been filled in as an example. What is good? (1–2 sentences) Aristotle – Virtue Ethics Mill – Utilitarianism Kant – Deontology Consequentialism Noddings – Care Ethics Aristotle, “the first great ethical naturalist, believed that the good for us is defined by our natural objective…The attainment of happiness is naturally our highest objective” (Moore & Bruder, 2011, p. 264). Good is happiness. For J.S. Mill, decreasing pain and increasing pleasure is good. However, not all pleasure is the same. Mill argues that intellectual pleasures are superior to bodily pleasures (Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapter 2). Good is doing something only for the sake of doing what is right, not because of sympathy. If the consequences of an action bring happiness, not only to yourself but to others as well, then it is good. Good is in helping others that are vulnerable. It makes the one helping happy and the ones that are helped happy. What path or rule do you follow to achieve the good? (1–2 sentences)

Ethical Theory Comparison Chart PHI/105 Version 5 1 Associate Level Material Ethical Theory Comparison Chart Respond to the prompt for each of the five ethical theories listed. One section on each chart has been filled in as an example. What is good? (1–2 sentences) Aristotle – Virtue Ethics Mill – Utilitarianism Kant – Deontology Consequentialism Noddings – Care Ethics For Aristotle, Believed that the good for us is defined by our natural objective. Was the first great ethical naturalist. For J.S. Mill, decreasing pain and increasing pleasure is good. However, not all pleasure is the same. Mill argues that intellectual pleasures are superior to bodily pleasures (Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapter 2). For Kant, He believed that the moral rule is something that holds without exception. Also you should act only on principles that could hold universally. For Consequentialism, The only good is happiness. Also that the choices that are made whether good or bad lead to consequences. For Noddings, One finds good in helping those who are vulnerable. It makes one happy and those who we help or take care of happy too. What path or rule do you follow to achieve the good? (1–2 sentences) Aristotle – Virtue Ethics Mill – Utilitarianism Kant – Deontology Consequentialism Noddings – Care Ethics For Aristotle, virtue is the way to achieve the good. Moral virtue is a state of character and can only be acquired by habit. In other words, we need to practice being morally virtuous in order to be virtuous. For Mill, One should not

0 thoughts on “Phi 105 Comparison Essay”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *